16    Chancery Court Proceedings, 1669.





          Liber C D The same day George Muncowe pl.t Henry Hyde defend.t
                 The pl.t was ordered last Court to Reply by this Court. No Repli
                cation being filed Carvile Attorney of defend.t moved to have the
                Bill to stand dismissed for want of prosecution with Costs Or
                dered that the same do stand dismissed accordingly with Six and
                forty Shillings and Eight pence Costs to be paid by the plt to the
                sd defendant

                 The same day Benjamin Cowell pl.t Jona Sibrey defend.t
                 A Cepi Corpus returned upon the Attachment paid &
                for his Contempt for want of an answer and was this day sworn
                to his answer

                 The same day John Bayley pl.t Raymond Staplefort
                 The plantiff having putt in his Exceptions to the defendants
                answer by his attorney prayed the same might be re
                ferred to some one of justices to Consider if the answer
                were sufficient in the Excepted unto or not M.r Jenifer p
                defend.t prays time till the next Court to amend his answer which
                is ordered accordingly in the meantime the Injunction formerly
                granted in this Cause is Continu'd

                 The same day in another Cause between the same persons
                 The defend.t by M.r Moorecroft his Attorney Craves time till the
                next Court to put in his answer to the plantiffs Bill which is ordered
                accordingly.

                 The same day the same agt: the same in another Cause

                 The defendant by M.r Moorecroft his attorney appeared upon
                the Scire facias for the defend.t to shew Cause why a partition of
                the Land therein mentioned should not be granted and for Cause
                shewed that the first part of the order upon which he of
                partition was to be grounded was not performed to witt that all
             p. 12 Accounts in relation to the Copartnership in the Land should be first
           (fol. 13) audited. Whereupon it is by Consent of all parties pl.t and defend :t
                and their Attorneys in Court ordered that the petioãn [sic] of the
                Land should be respited till such time as the said account
                and it was by the like Consent ordered that it should be referred
                to M.r Christopher Rouseby and M.r Garrette Vansweringen for
                the plantiff and M.r Thomas Dent and Mr Kenelme Cheseldyne for
                the defendant to audite all accounts in relation to the said plant
                and if they could not all meet conveniently about the
                said  then any two of them were to meet conveniently and
               hear and determine the same if they could provided the two so to meet
                        one of the persons nominated by the plantiff and the
                other by the defend.t as afd and they are to be armed with a speciall
                Commission for that purpose which they are to speed and Execute