|
636 MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS
Bordley in his lifetime the said Quantity of five thousand two hundd and
Seventy Nine pounds of Toba and As to the Quantity of Eleven thousand
four Hundd and four pounds of Tob" the remaining part of the said Sixteen
thousand Six Hundd and Eighty three pounds of Tobacco he the said Fran-
cis Holland Did before the impetration and Exhibition of the writt aforesa
by the said attry Genll agt the said John Stokes as Afsd Vizt: on the first Day of
July in the Year of Our Lord One thousand Seven hundd and twenty Six in
Baltemore County afsd offer unto the said Thomas Bordley in his lifetime the
said Eleven thousand four Hundd and four Pounds of Tobacco the remaining
Part of the said Sixteen thousand Six Hundd and Eighty three pounds of
Tobacco According to the forme and Effect of the Condition afsd Without
that That he the Said Francis Holland Did assume Upon himself and to
the said Thomas Bordley Did Promise in Manner and form as the said attor-
ney Genll by his replication afsd hath alledged to pay to the said Thomas
Boidlcy the said Sixteen thousand Six Hunda and Eighty tlncc Pounds of
Tobacco And this he the said [835] John is also ready to Verify Wherefore he
prays Judgment as before and that the said attorney Genll on Behalf of the
Lord Propry the Action afsd Against him the Said John from having may be
Precluded etc: And the afsd Michll Howard his said Lordships attorney Gen-
erall Saith that the plea afsd of the said John Stokes in Manner and form afsd
above by rejoyning pleaded and the matter in the same Contained Are Insuf-
ficient in Law him the said Attry Genll to preclude from Maintaining and hav-
ing the Action afsd thereof against him the Said John Stokes to which he the
same attorney Genll hath no Need Nor by the Law of the Land is held in
Any Sort to Answer and this he is ready to verifie Wherefore for want of a
Sufficient rejoynder in this Part he the said attorney Genll Prayeth judgment
and the Debt aforesaid Together with Damages Occationed by the Detention
of that Debt unto the said Lord Propry to be Adjudged.
And the afsd John Stokes for that he hath Above in his rejoynder pleaded
alledged Sufficient Matter in Law to Barr the Afsa Attry Genll for the said
Lord Propry from having his Action Aforest against him the said John Stokes
which he is ready to veryfie which matter the afsd attorney Genll hath not
Gaynsaied nor thereunto in Any wise answered But the same to Admitt for
true hath altogether refused As before prays Judgment and that the said Attry
Genll from his Action Aforest for the Said Lord Propry against him the said
John Stokes may be Barred etc:
Whereupon all and Singular the Premisses being by the Court here Seen
heard and fully Understood and Mature Deliberation thereupon had for that
it Seems to the Court here that the afsd John Stokes hath Above in his re-
joynder Pleaded Alledged Sufficient Matter in Law to Barr the afsd attorney
Genll for the Said Lord Proprietary from having his Action aforest against
him the said John Stokes.
Therefore it is Considered by the justices here the 15th Day of October
|