clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Maryland Court of Appeals, 1695-1729
Volume 77, Page 647   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

APPENDIX

[Pages 33 to 42 of the original volume were cut from the book some
time in the past. A brief contemporary index in the volume shows that
they contained parts of transcripts of proceedings in Randolph v. Blackmore
and the Ship Ann, and Burroughs v. Copley's Administrator, and a report of
opinions of the lawyers on questions which arose in connection with those
appeals: specifically, on attaints of juries in the province and disposition of
questions of fact appearing in cases appealed. The opinions in the former
case, at least, were quite evidently the same as those recorded by Denton in
another volume, Liber H. D, pp. 350-358, now published in Archives of
Maryland, XX, 438-445. They are reproduced here from that volume.]

Queries to the Attorneys how Attaints may be brought agt Juries etc*

Ordered that the Rt honoDle the Lords of the Committee of Trade and
forraign Plantations be humbly supplicated that they would please to give
directions how Attaints may be brought agt Juries in this Countrey and if to
be done, by what Rule they may be brought.

How matters of fact vpon Appeals brought before the Governor and
Councill may be tryed; And when an Error in Fact is Assigned vpon an Ap-
peal or Writ of Error brought to a Superiour Court, before whom such Fact
is not cognoscible, what course shall be taken to Trye that Matter of Fact.

Ordered that the aforegoing Quasries be put to the Lawyers of the pro-
vinciall Court for them to make Return of their Opinions therein as likewise
make Answer to the following Case put, Vizt

Edward Randolph Esqr Qui tarn Agta John Blackmore and the ship Ann

Vpon Appeal from the provinciall Court to the Governr and Councill;
the Error in Law Assigned, was that the Bond taken for the sd ship being an
illegall Bond the provinciall Court Judgmt ought to be Reversed; there-
vpon the Councill for the King moved whether the Reversall of that Judgmt
might not be deemed condemnation of the ship, producing some Authori-
ties; But the Defendant Arguing that there being matter of fact to be de-
cided, Vii* whether the ship tooke in Tobacco hefore Bond given, therefore

ought not to be condemned before tht matter of fact is tryed.

Ordered that the Attorneys Return severally their Opinion therein in
Ordr to be sent for England.

The Lawyers Opinions in the aforegoing Queries return'd are as fol-
lows, Vizt


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Maryland Court of Appeals, 1695-1729
Volume 77, Page 647   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives