|
|
|
140
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the nega-
tive.
The question then recurring upon the adoption of the
amendment submitted by Mr. Stirling,
Mr. Barron demanded the yeas and nays,
The demand being sustained,
The yeas and nays were called and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.
Messrs. Hebb, Robinette,
Goldsborough. P't Hopkins, Russell,
Abbott, Jones, of Cecil, Sands,
Annan, Keefer, Schlosser,
Baker, Kennard, Scott,
Barron, King, Sneary,
Carter, Larsh, Stirling,
Cunningham, Markey, Stockbridge,
Cushing, McComas, Swope,
Daniel, Mullikin, Sykes,
Davis, of Wash. Murray, Thomas,
Dellinger, Negley, Thruston,
Earle, Noble^ Todd,
Ecker, Nyman, Valliant,
Farrow, Parker, Wickard,
Galloway, Pugh, Wooden—49.
Greene, Purnell,
* NEGATIVE.
Messrs. Belt, Dennis, Mace,
Berry, of Balt. co. Duvall, Marbury,
Berry, of P. Geo., Edelen, Mitchell,
Billingsley, Harwood, Miller,
Blackiston, Henkle, Morgan,
Bond, Hollyday, Parran,
Briscoe, Horsey, Ridgely,
Chambers, Johnson, Smith, of Dor.
Clarke, Jones, of Sora. Turner,
Crawford, Lee, Wilmer—31.
Davis, of Charles,
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the
affirmative.
The question finally being on the adoption of the original
Article (Article 26) as amended;
Mr. Berry, of Prince George's, demanded the yeas and
nays.
|
|
|
|
 |
