|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ecker,
|
Mitchell,
|
Swope,
|
|
|
|
Farrow,
|
Miller,
|
Sykes,
|
|
|
|
Galloway,
|
Morgan,
|
Thomas,
|
|
|
|
Greene,
|
Mullikin,
|
Todd,
|
|
|
|
Hebb,
|
Murray,
|
Valliant,
|
|
|
|
Henkle,
|
Negley,
|
Wickard,
|
|
|
|
Hodson,
|
Noble,
|
Wooden — 54-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the nega-
tive.
Mr. Henkle submitted the following amendment:
Article 37, 12th line, strike out the word "five, " and in-
sert the word "fifty; "
Decided in the negative.
Mr. Brown submitted the following amendment:
Article 37, 11th line, strike out the word "leave, " and in-
sert the word "sanction; "
Decided in the negative.
Mr. Cushing submitted the following amendment:
Article 37, 10th line, insert, after the words "without the, "
the words "prior or subsequent sanction; "
Decided in the affirmative.
Mr. Stockbridge submitted the following amendment:
Article 38, strike out all after the word "as, " in the 2nd
line, and add, "is most in accordance with, and most bind-
ing upon the conscience of the person to whom such oath or
affirmation may be administered; "
Decided in the negative.
Mr. Jones, of Somerset, submitted the following amend-
ment:
Article 39, insert after the word "'of" in the first line, the
words "speech and of. "
The question being on the adoption of the amendment,
Mr. Jones, of Somerset, demanded the yeas and nays,
The demand. being sustained,
The yeas and nays were called and appeared as follows:
|
|
|
|
 |
