clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 187   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

13 E. 1, STAT. 1, CAP. 34, ELOPEMENT. 187
manors of her husband, yet she shall be barred of her dower by this branch
without the husband's* free reconciliation, albeit it hath been other- 139
wise holden; and the reason that they yielded is because it is no elopement,
whereas it appeareth before that the words reliqwierit et abierit (leave and
go away) are not of the substance of the bar of dower but the adultery and
the remaining with the adulterer, and albeit she and the adulterer remain
within any of the lands or manors of the husband, yet (the words being
si uxor sponte reliqiderit, &c.) she hath left and gone from her husband in
that case which is a personal offence." And Britton, 258 b, writing shortly
after the Statute, and speaking of a writ of dower against the heir and his
guardian, observes, "he may say she hath forfeited dower of her husband by
adultery, for she went from her husband to another bed after she had mar-
ried him and so forfeited her dower." It appears too from Paynell's case,
that after elopement the law will not permit an averment that there was no
adultery, though after the death of the husband the wife and the adulterer
intermarry, Co. Litt. 32 a, n. 10.
Forfeiture based on adultery rather than elopement.—The modern as well
as the ancient authorities accordingly place the forfeiture on the fact of the
wife's living apart from her husband in adultery, and not on the circum-
stances attending the elopement. Thus in Hetherington v. Graham, 6 Bing.
135, where the tenant pleaded that the wife during coverture had volun-
tarily left her husband and lived in adultery, the demandant replied that
she left with her husband's consent, and that the separation so continued
till the husband's death, and if any adultery took place it was after such
separation by mutual consent. The Court stated the question to be, whether
committing an act of adultery and continuing with the adulterer is a bar
where the wife has previously left the husband with his consent and is
living apart with his consent at the time of adultery, or whether it is nec-
essary to satisfy the words of the Statute, that the original leaving of her
husband should be with the adulterer by his means or persuasion, and it
was determined that it was not necessary that the wife had left her hus-
band willingly with the adulterer, had gone away with, and had also con-
tinued with him, but that it was sufficient to bring the case within the
Statute, if the wife has of her own consent left the society of her husband,
and after she has so left him commit the act of adultery. All the circum-
stances mentioned in the Act need not concur in form if they do in sub-
stance.
In the later case of Woodward v. Dowse, 10 C- B., 722, to a similar plea
the demandant replied that she was forced to and necessarily did leave her
husband by reason of his cruelty, which was sufficient to make cohabitation
with him unsafe and to entitle her to a divorce a mensa et tore, and that
she was ready to return to him but for his cruelty and his cohabitation
with another woman. And the Court held that she had forfeited her dower
though she had originally left her husband in consequence of his cruelty.
Willes J. observed that on looking at the Statute of Rape, 6 R. 2, c. 6, and
this against carrying away a religious, it would appear that the word
sponte is used in contradistinction to a forced elopement. The best con-
struction is that leaving sponte is not of the essence of the offence that
leads to forfeiture. It is enough if having left her husband's house she commit
adultery. Nay, the words sponte relic/merit, &c; are satisfied by the mere

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 187   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives