clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 201   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

13 E. 1, STAT. 1, CAP. 45, SCIRE FACIAS. 201
Parties* to scire facias. 1-'—In Arnott v. Nicholls, 1 H. & J. 471, A. obtained
a judgment against B. with a stay of one year. Before the expiration of the
stay, the defendant conveyed certain of his lands to a bona fide purchaser
12
Parties* defendant.—All original defendants, if living, must be made
parties to a scire facias, or their omission accounted for by suggestion in
the writ; otherwise a demurrer will lie, not a plea in abatement. Bowie
v. Neal, 41 Md. 124.
Where a sole defendant in a judgment is dead, a scire facias to revive the
same may be issued against his personal representative alone and judgment
thereon will only bind assets; but if it is desired to bind decedent's land, it
must issue not against the terre-tenants alone but the personal representa-
tive must also be joined, not for the same reason that all terre-tenants must
be joined but because the personal representative is the one best able to de-
fend the suit. Tiers v. Codd, 87 Md. 447. But see Polk v. Pendleton, 31 Md.
118, where it is said that in such case a scire facias may issue against the
heirs and terre-tenants without joining the personal representative. All
terre-tenants should be made parties, otherwise any terre-tenant who is
made a party may plead in abatement the failure to do so. But while the
judgment must be revived against all, the debtor cannot compel the levy
and execution of the writ upon all the lands. If the land of only one terre-
ienant is sold, he may enforce contribution in equity from all with whom
he stood "in equali jure." Walsh v. Boyle, 30 Md. 262. See on this subject
generally Poe's Practice, sec. 593.
Who are terre- tenants.—All who are in possession under the judgment
debtor, such as heirs, devisees, mortgagees, or alienees after the judgment,
are terre-tenants. They are in as of the estate of the judgment debtor and
before the judgment can be revived and enforced by execution against the
land so as to divest their title, it is necessary to warn them by scirc facias
so they may have an opportunity of making their defense and claiming
contribution from others holding lands of the judgment debtor bound by
the judgment. But where a party is in possession holding by title adverse
to the judgment debtor or paramount to his, (as a purchaser at a tax sale),
he is not a terre-tenant because his rights are in no manner affected by the
judgment. If he has a good title the judgment does not bind the land nor
can a sale under the execution affect his interest. If he has not a good
title, then he has no right to claim contribution by reason of the land being
taken to satisfy the judgment. Polk v. Pendleton, 31 Md. 118; Lee v. Early,
44 Md. 80, 94. Cf. Adams v. Stake, 67 Md. 447.
The assignment by one entitled as distributee of an estate to an undivided
interest in a chattel real by a deed not recorded among the land records,
but lodged in the office of the register of wills where the estate is being ad-
ministered, followed by a distribution of such interest to the assignee in
the administration account and a subsequent deed to her of it by the admin-
istrator pursuant to an order of the Orphans Court, makes the assignee a
terre-tenant. Wright v. Ryland, 92 Md. 645.
A Afire facias against terre-tenants is either general or special, general
when it issues against all terre-tenants without naming them in the writ
but leaving them to be named in the sheriff's return, special when the names
of the terre-tenants are set out in the writ. In the latter case plaintiff must
name all terre-tenants holding lands subject to the lien of the judgment.

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 201   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives