clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search		 search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 41   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

OHIO LIFE INS. & TRUST CO. VS. ROSS & WINN. 41
and Mann, and Dawson and Norwood, and Samuel Jones, in
the year 1846, received a quantity of articles made at the
factory, upon which they made considerable cash advances—
and that on the 20th of September, 1847, there remained a
balance in their hands of $9819 22, resulting from sales
made by them.
The bill calls for an account of this property, which is in-
cluded in the confirmatory mortgage of the 16th of June, 1846,
and it appears by the evidence of Hancock, that when Jones,
or Dawson and Norwood, took possession of the factory on
the 2lst of June, 1846, the stock of material on hand, worked
up, and to be worked up, was worth about $18,000. There
was also evidence, that after Jones got possession of the fac-
tory, he purchased materials which were used there to the
amount of $23,000. The council for the complainants insist,
that Clarke and Kellogg are responsible to the creditors under
the two last mortgages, for the proceeds of the sales of manu-
factured articles, on hand, and made from materials on hand,
on the 2lst of July, 1846, except such portion thereof as was
paid by them to Dawson and Norwood, and which amounted,
according to the proof of Hancock, to $3280.
Without meaning now to decide this question, the order will
direct the auditor, to state such accounts as will enable the
court, hereafter, to make such a disposition of it, as the rights
of the parties, and the justice of the case, may seem to require.
BRENT & WILKINS for complainants.
DULANEY & ALEXANDER for defendants.
5*

  		clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 2, Page 41   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives