clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 205   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

CARTER VS. CALVERT. 205
successions, and he relies on this bond so prepared as demon-
strating most clearly that at the time of said reference the
complainant did not suppose the conveyance aforesaid was
designed as a full and complete settlement and satisfaction of
any one or other of the claims of complainant and wife as is
now pretended.
He further avers, that on the 20th of January, 1848, the
said arbitrators, with George M. Bibb, the umpire selected
by them, made their award, after due consideration of all the
pretensions and proofs of the parties, and thereby awarded that
the said George Calvert, at the time of his death, on the 28th
of January, 1838, was indebted unto complainant's late wife in
the sum of $8039 51, and that from the said sum there should be
deducted the sums which had been paid on account to complain-
ant by defendant since the death of the said George Calvert, and
he avers that the statement C. B. C., No. 4., filed with the answer,
contains an accurate account of the payment made to complain-
ant prior, and up to, the time of its preparation, and that the orig-
inal was prepared and laid before the arbitrators anterior to the
date of their award, and with the knowledge and consent of the
complainant, and for the purpose of said reference, and that to
ascertain the precise sum now to be paid to complainant by de-
fendant, it was only necessary to discount from the sum so
awarded, with interest, the several sums shown by said exhibit
to have been paid by defendant. But he avers, that after pre-
paring the original of said exhibit, he has paid to complainant
further sums amounting to $810 15, and he insists that the
balance which may remain after making all such deductions is
all that is now due from defendant as representing his deceased
father, and from his father's estate to the complainant and
other representatives of his said wife, and pleads and relies
upon said award as a full answer and bar to all the relief prayed
by the bill. He avers; that this award was made after a pa-
tient examination and consideration by the arbitrators of the
allegations and proofs laid before them by the parties, and
defendant believes it truly and correctly states the amount due
from the said George Calvert, deceased, at the time of his death,
17*

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 205   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives