| Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 360 View pdf image (33K) |
|
360 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY. Banking House of J. I. Cohen & Brothers, in the year 1839, by the then proprietors thereof, and that no transfer of these shares was ever made by B. I. Cohen individually. It also appears, that in the year 1827, six gentlemen were appointed trustees of the theatre, under an agreement between the stockholders and William Warren, the terms of which are stated by Mr. Meredith, in his deposition. The trustees were Messrs. Gwynn, Lucas, Stewart, Frick, B. I. Cohen and Mere- dith. By an arrangement, the details of which are given In the depo- sition of the same gentleman, certain shares of stock which stood in the name of B. I. Cohen were transferred by him to indivi- dual members of the trustees in extinguishment of a debt due by Oohcn to the trust fund, with an understanding that each of the trustees to whom transfers were thus made should give bond for the same, and should also, as a further security, retransfer the stock to the treasurer of the board of trustees, retaining, however, the use of the shares until they should be called upon to surrender them. Bonds were accordingly given by all the parties, including B. I. Cohen, who retained four shares under the arrangement, and in November, 1842, all the parties except Cohen, retransferred to the treasurer the shares placed in their respective names, with a memorandum opposite each transfer, in the transfer book, that the same was made as collateral security for the bonds given by them as above mentioned. On the 11th of April, 1843, Mendez I. Oohen transferred to Johnson & Lee, the same thirty-five shares which on the 14th of June, 1841, had been transferred to him by J. I. Cohen & Brothers, and on the 23d of May, 1843, Johnson & Lee retrans- ferred the same thirty-five shares to him. B. I. Cohen having died indebted to the trust fund in the amount of the bond so given by him, being $426 50, and having but one share of stock now standing in his name, certain parties, having an interest in the fund for distribution, object to the al- lowance to Mendez I. Cohen, of the dividend due upon shares numbered 44 and 76, because as they allege, these shares con- stituted a part of the trust fund, and -were known to be such |
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 360 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.