clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 366   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

866 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
impressions inclined him to yield to the suggestions of the de-
fendant to allow him interest on his overpayment, but upon
further investigation, he had come to a different conclusion ;
and finally declares his own willingness, and the willingness of
the other parties to settle, as first proposed, for the purpose of
closing up the matter in a spirit of peace and harmony.
The question is upon the effect of this letter, its genuineness
being admitted, and it being also admitted that the writer was
a party to the original decree, and the solicitor and agent of
the other parties.
When these negotiations commenced, and what influence they
may have had in inducing an abandonment of the appeal, it is
impossible to ascertain with any great degree of certainty, but
it is very obvious that the parties did not consider the decree of
August, 1841, as conclusively settling the questions in issue be-
tween them, and that for some reason or other, the defendant
abandoned, or pretermitted the right which he had secured to
have the decree against him reviewed by the appellate court.
If these negotiations induced him to waive his appeal, then the
promise to allow the credit which was the result of them, rests
upon a good and valid consideration, and should be enforced.
And I confess that looking to the relations of the parties, the
character of the transactions out of which the claim arises,
and the scope and tenor of the letter, the impression upon my
mind is very strong that but for these efforts to bring about a
friendly settlement, and the natural and praiseworthy desire to
compromise a family controversy, the case would have been
subjected to the revision of the superior court.
The argument for the counsel for the complainant, in which.
this credit is now resisted, insists that the offer to allow it was
prompted by a desire to insure a speedy settlement of the claim,
which object not being accomplished, the offer was withdrawn,
and accordingly we find in the agreement attached to the letter,
that prior to the filing the petition for the subpoeenas scire facias,
the authority of the counsel of the complainant to give the
credit was revoked.
But the question is, had the complainants the right to do

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 366   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives