clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 513   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

WAYMAN VS. JONES. 513
I am not aware of any other matter now in dispute in the
case, except the question of costs. Any costs incurred or paid
by Stockett alone, if there be such, should be paid out of the
funds, as they were not incurred by his default or misconduct.
The banks cannot be allowed costs, as the litigation in this mat-
ter never would have taken place but for their negligence, nor
can Wayman be allowed costs, he being equally culpable. The
costs of Mrs. Jones and the cestui que trusts may be allowed
out of the fund, as it will in that case fall upon them in nearly
just proportions in consequence of their respective interests in
the fund.
[On the 6th of December, 1850, a further opinion was de-
livered in the case, upon the submission of the corrected ac-
counts for ratification.]
OPINION OF JUDGE BREWER:
This cause is again submitted on the Auditor's report of Au-
gust 13th, 1850, and the accounts corrected in pursuance of the
order of the court, of July 18th, 1850. The accounts F., G.,
J. and K., corrected, seem to be in conformity with that order.
Mrs. Jones is not, however, to be charged with any portion
of the interest which would otherwise have been payable to her,
to the exoneration of her husband's personal estate, from which
she is to contribute one-third. Accounts F., G., J. and K.,
corrected, are, therefore, hereby ratified and confirmed, and a
decree or order may be prepared in conformity therewith, with
the exception above stated.
Accounts J. No. 1, and K. No. 1, corrected, are rejected.
The decision as to costs will be governed by the order of July
18th. The expense of stating the accounts, to wit, Auditor's
fees, although charged by him to the banks, are not more their
costs than the costs of the other parties, and should be paid in
equal proportions by the banks, Wayman, and Mrs. Jones, as
administratrix of her deceased husband.
A. RANDALL, for Wayman.
MCLEAN and ALEXANDER, for the other Parties.
VOL. iv—43

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 513   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives