clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 519   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

IGLEHART VS. MAYER. 519
entries of the Judgment recovered by Lee against him, are
filed as exhibits with the bill.
In this affidavit, made on the 3d of September, 1833, Lee
swears that he rented the land of which the late William Dun-
can died seized, for the last seven years, from Robinson, as
guardian of William B. and Caroline Duncan. "That the
terms upon which he rented were, that Robinson should receive
one-third of the annual crops of tobacco and grain, which have
usually been sent to Baltimore to be sold, and the proceeds di-
vided between deponent and the said Robinson. That by the
terms of the contract the said Robinson had a right to receive
his part of the crops in kind, and was not obliged to wait for
the sales. That during the second year of deponent's ten-
ancy, as well as he recollects, in the latter part of the summer
or early part of the autumn, Richard Iglehart, then sheriff of
Anne Arundel county, levied on the land and on the tobacco
raised the previous year, to wit: Eleven hogsheads of tobacco
to satisfy a fieri facias issued, as deponent understood from
Iglehart, out of the Chancery Court, at the instance of Perry
Townshend and wife, against William J. B. Duncan and Caro-
line Duncan. That the said tobacco was, by permission of
said Iglehart, sent to Baltimore by this deponent for sale, was
sold, and one-third of the proceeds paid to said Iglehart."
The Chancellor granted the injunction as prayed, and after
thfe return of the subpoena, an attachment was issued against
the defendant at December term, 1838, returnable to the March
term, 1839, which was then returned attached, and an order,
pro confesso, passed, requiring the defendant to appear and an-
swer, plead or demur to the bill, on or before the 4th day of
the following July term. Under this order the defendant ap-
peared on the 12th of July, 1839, and filed a general demurrer
to the bill, in which the complainant joined. The cause was
then continued until March term, 1844, when the defendant,
by his counsel, submitted the demurrer to the Chancellor for
decision, asking leave "to answer in case the demurrer should
be decided against him." At the same term, the Chancellor,
(Bland,) passed a decree overruling the demurrer and making
the injunction perpetual.

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 519   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives