|
cost method is the actuarial cost method used to determine the employer's contribution rates and the actuarial
accrued liability. All administrative costs of the Plan are paid by the Plan.
Employer contributions to the Plan totaling $11,918,000 (12.5% of covered payroll) for fiscal year 1996 were
made in accordance with actuarially determined contribution requirements based on an actuarial valuation
performed as of June 30,1995. This amount consisted of $2,328,000 normal cost and $9,590,000 amortization of the
actuarial accrued liability (2.4% and 10.0%, respectively, of covered payroll).
The liquidation period for the actuarial accrued liabilities (as provided by law) is 24 years from June 30,1996.
Significant actuarial assumptions used to compute contribution requirements are the same as those used to
compute the annual pension cost and net pension obligations.
The computation of the annual required contribution for fiscal year 1996 was based on the same actuarial
assumptions, benefit provisions, actuarial funding method, and other significant factors used to determine pension
contribution requirements in the previous year.
Annual Pension Cost and Net Pension Obligation:
The Administration's annual pension cost for the fiscal years ending June 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994 were
$11,918,000, $11,323,000 and $8,452,000, respectively.
The Administration contributed 100% of the annual pension cost for each of the fiscal years ending June 30,
1996, 1995 and 1994 for the Plan.
The Administration's net pension obligation was zero as of June 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994 for the Plan. In
addition, there was no transition liability determined in accordance with GASB Statement No. 27. This transition
resulted in no difference between the 1995 and 1996 reported liability.
The fiscal year 1996 annual pension cost and net pension obligations were determined as a part of an actuarial
valuation as of June 30, 1996. The significant actuarial assumptions listed below were used for the Plan.
|
Valuation method .............................................................
|
.................................Entry Age Normal Method
|
|
Cost method of valuing assets........................................
|
.................................Fair Value
|
|
Rate of return on investments........................................
|
.................................7.50% Compounded per Annum
|
|
Projected inflation rate ....................................................
|
.................................5.00%
|
|
Rate of salary increase.................. ..................................
|
.................................5.75% Compounded per Annum
|
|
Postretirement benefit increase.. ...................................
|
.................................3.00%
|
|
Amortization method. .......................................................
|
.................................Level dollar annual installments
|
|
Amortization period....... ..................................................
|
.................................30 years from July 1, 1989
|
|
Status of period (Open or Closed) ................................
|
.................................Open
|
There were no changes in actuarial assumptions or benefit provisions which significantly affected the
valuation of the annual pension cost and net pension obligation during fiscal year 1996 and no significant changes
in these assumptions are planned in the near term.
Change in Accounting Principles
Effective July 1, 1995, the State adopted Statements No. 25 and 27 of the Governmental Accounting Standards
Board, "Financial Reporting for Defined Benefit Pension Plans and Note Disclosures for Defined Contribution
Plans," and "Accounting for Pensions by State and Local Governmental Employers", respectively. Statement No. 25
requires pension trust funds to account for plan assets, liabilities and net assets at their fair values. The provisions
of this statement require retroactive restatement of net assets as of June 30, 1995 for the effect of changing the
method of accounting for investments from the cost basis to fair value. The effect of this change in accounting
principle on the previously reported net assets is as follows (amounts expressed in thousands).
|
|
State Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
and Pension
|
Mass Transit
|
|
|
|
System of
|
Administration
|
|
|
|
Maryland
|
Pension Plan
|
Total
|
|
Net assets at June 30, 1995, as previously reported... .............................................................
|
$16,269,489
|
$23,790
|
$16,293,279
|
|
Effect of change in accounting for investments.... ...................................................................
|
2,197,840
|
1,439
|
2,199,279
|
|
Net assets at June 30, 1995, as restated ....................................................................................
|
$18,467,329
|
$25,229
|
$18,492,558
|
66
|
 |