|
1
|
have, we felt that it would be sufficient to just say
|
|
2
|
they will have such jurisdiction as may be provided by
|
|
3
|
law, and we anticipate that there will be attached to a
|
|
4
|
constitution to be voted on what they call a schedule,
|
|
5
|
which will maintain the present jurisdiction, statutory
|
|
6
|
jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals until and unless it
|
|
7
|
is changed by the Legislature.
|
|
8
|
MR. SYKES: Isn't the general tendency now to
|
|
9
|
give the appellate, the Supreme Court only appellate
|
|
10
|
jurisdiction? I have also in mind the problem where
|
|
11
|
you would give the Legislature presumably under the Con-
|
|
12
|
stitution power to cut off all jurisdiction from the
|
|
13
|
Court of Appeals. I think that the jurisdiction should
|
|
14
|
be appellate only and that the Legislature should be re-
|
|
15
|
quired by ths Constitution to spell out that appellate
|
|
16
|
jurisdiction and to grant it. I would suggest that it
|
|
17
|
should read that the Supreme Court of Appeals shall have
|
|
18
|
an appellate jurisdiction, which shall be provided by law.
|
|
19
|
MR. MARTINEAU: I don't think that would be
|
|
20
|
required by the Legislature.
|
|
21
|
MR. SYKES: I think it would give the Supreme
|