|
1
|
draft should simply say. should have appellate jurisdic-
|
|
2
|
tion, without saying final.
|
|
5
|
MR. SYKES: Yes. That would prevent the
|
|
4
|
Legislature from completely drifting.
|
|
&
|
MR. MARTINEAU: I doubt it would. It wouldn't
|
|
6
|
be a grant of jurisdiction. It would be merely a limi-
|
|
7
|
tation.
|
|
8
|
MR. SYKES: No. The statement of the Constitu-
|
|
9
|
tion that the Appellate Court of Appeals, Supreme Court
|
|
10
|
of Appeals shall have appellate jurisdiction is a man-
|
|
11
|
datory statement.
|
|
12
|
MR. MARTINEAU: Then all you have to do is
|
|
13
|
leave the jurisdiction in one case, one type of case, and
|
|
14
|
that wouldn't solve the problem.
|
|
15
|
MR. INVERNIZZI: At Atlantic City, the language
|
|
16
|
I noticed was the Supreme Court of Appeals shall have
|
|
17
|
appellate jurisdiction and such other jurisdiction as may
|
|
18
|
be provided by law.
|
|
19
|
THE CHAIRMAN: That is correct.
|
|
20
|
MR. ENEY: This brings to light the fact that
|
|
21
|
the reason for the provision for other jurisdiction is
|
