|
1
|
It was spelled out.
|
|
2
|
THE CHAIRMAN: I may be wrong about that.
|
|
3
|
JUDGE CARTER: Unless it be spelled out in the
|
|
4
|
amendment.
|
|
5
|
JUDGE BRUNE: I don't want to interrupt, but
|
|
6
|
my recollection is that the constitutional amendment
|
|
7
|
now pending providing for the intermediate appellate
|
|
8
|
court does set up judicial, but provides the may be
|
|
9
|
changed by the Legislature. I may be in error.
|
|
10
|
MS. ENEY: That, in effect, is what this does.
|
|
11
|
JUDGE CARTER: This leaves it wide open. This
|
|
12
|
is only one voice. I am diametrically opposed to that
|
|
13
|
sort of proposition.
|
|
14
|
MR. ENEY: My point is that is exactly what
|
|
15
|
is happening under the constitutional amendment with res-
|
|
16
|
pect to the court.
|
|
17
|
JUDGE CARTER: Why put it in there at all? If
|
|
18
|
you are not going to write 'some safeguards in the Consti-
|
|
19
|
tution, that secures representation on a territorial
|
|
20
|
basis, at least to some extent, why put it in there at
|
|
21
|
all? You have got a Legislature that is predominantly
|
