|
1
|
obviously nonrural, if you are going to secure represen-
|
|
2
|
tation on this court in a territorial way, at least to
|
|
3
|
some extent, and I think the limitation ought to be
|
|
4
|
written into the Constitution. It ought not be legis-
|
|
5
|
lative will.
|
|
6
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Judge Carter, it was suggested
|
|
7
|
at Atlantic City that the Constitution provide that there
|
|
8
|
be districts but not attempt to pinpoint exactly what
|
|
9
|
the geographical districts would be in the Constitution.
|
|
10
|
JUDGE CARTER: Could there be something put
|
|
11
|
in there to the effect that there should be provision
|
|
12
|
made on a territorial geographic basis indicating some
|
|
15
|
distribution on that score?
|
|
14
|
THE CHAIRMAN: I think another suggestion, and
|
|
15
|
I believe Judge Oppenheimer made this at the meeting in
|
|
16
|
Atlantic City, that the districts be as they are now in
|
|
17
|
the present setup until and unless ciianged by the Legis-
|
|
18
|
lature .
|
|
19
|
JUDGE CARTER: Well, I don't want to belabor
|
|
20
|
the point, but it seems to me if you are going to have a
|
|
21
|
s tatewide court, then some consideration, I don't say
|
