|
1
|
on the subject of districting, and a compromise was
|
|
2
|
written into the plan as originally proposed, as I recall
|
|
3
|
it, which provided for recognition of different sections
|
|
4
|
of the State. Without such a compromise, it wouldn't have
|
|
5
|
gotten through the Legislature of those days. I empha-
|
|
6
|
size that. That long preceded Baker and Todd. I saw no
|
|
7
|
objection to writing in it because as a practical matter,
|
|
8
|
I thought it was what would be done anyhow, and I believe
|
|
9
|
that despite Judge Carter's words and feelings that it
|
|
10
|
would work out, that there would be representation of
|
|
11
|
different parts and different interests in the St«te.
|
|
12
|
It is just the way things seem to go.
|
|
13
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Let's move on to the third level.
|
|
14
|
JUDGE CARTER: I don't wsnt to debate this
|
|
15
|
matter with Judge Brune, but if that is the situation, it
|
|
16
|
seems it is more appropriate to spell it out than leave
|
|
17
|
it to chance.
|
|
18
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Let's move to the third section,
|
|
19
|
dealing with what we have called the Appellate Court,
|
|
20
|
which corresponds to the Court of Special Appeals that
|
|
21
|
will be voted on in November.
|