|
1
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Because we didn't feel it was
|
|
2
|
necessary.
|
|
3
|
JUDGE FAIRBANKS: In other words, you think as
|
|
4
|
otherwise provided by law is sufficient?
|
|
5
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Yes.
|
|
6
|
MR. RODOWSKY: And because the Supreme Court
|
|
7
|
of Appeals got added to the list, too. It got added
|
|
8
|
to the list of possible legislative repository of
|
|
9
|
original jurisdiction. You end up with the whole system.
|
|
10
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Here is another reason, too,
|
|
11
|
Judge: There are and will be, I an sure, situations in
|
|
12
|
which the People's Court and the Circuit Court will have
|
|
13
|
concurrent jurisdiction, concurrent original jurisdiction
|
|
14
|
in certain cases.
|
|
15
|
JUDGE FAIRBANKS: They will in civil jurisdic-
|
|
16
|
tion, but would that be true in criminal or traffic?
|
|
17
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Possibly.
|
|
18
|
MR. REDDEN: My comment, Mr. Chairman, or my
|
|
19
|
suggestion to you, Mr. Chairman, is that in view of the
|
|
20
|
last sentence in the comment on the top of Page 5, refer-
|
|
21
|
ence to what could happen to the jurisdiction of the
|
