|
1
|
JUDGE RASIN: Why should it vary?
|
|
2
|
MR. RODOWSKY: The question of whether the
|
|
3
|
legislative, if it is a legislative judgment, the question
|
|
4
|
of whether it is a good or bad thing to require uniformity
|
|
5
|
completely across the board, whether there might not be
|
|
6
|
a need in a metropolitan area for a greater concurrent
|
|
7
|
jurisdiction than in some other areas of the State so that
|
|
8
|
you would want to permit a larger concurrent jurisdiction
|
|
9
|
in some sections.
|
|
10
|
MS. MARTINEAU: I think the feeling is the
|
|
11
|
desire for uniformity isn't necessarily, isn't the same
|
|
12
|
when you are talking about concurrent jurisdiction, and
|
|
13
|
we don't want to foreclose the meeting of different
|
|
14
|
problems in different parts of the State, where you might
|
|
15
|
have a large backlog in one, on the Circuit Court level,
|
|
16
|
where you have jury trials and such things, and you might
|
|
17
|
want to open up the ability of people to go into the
|
|
18
|
district or to the People's Court and have it tried. Then
|
|
19
|
you can only do that if you can expand easily the concur-
|
|
20
|
rent jurisdiction.
|
|
21
|
JUDGE PROCTOR: Isn't the answer in the tr.etro-
|
