|
 
|
19
|
|
1
|
forth that come about by reason of that very factual
|
|
2
|
change and, in order to more or less be flexible to con-
|
|
3
|
tend and cope with those complexities, intergovernmental
|
|
4
|
agreement would certainly be something that would come
|
|
5
|
within the scope of the actual constitutional provision
|
|
6
|
that we would write.
|
|
7
|
We do not have one in the Constitution at the
|
|
8
|
present time. We do have a provision for intergovern-
|
|
9
|
mental relations in the suggested models, but actually
|
|
10
|
our present Constitution is barren insofar as providing
|
|
11
|
for any such thing, and it seems to me that that is cer-
|
|
12
|
tainly one of the best ways of coping with the problem
|
|
13
|
and the overflowing of those problems from one munici-
|
|
14
|
pality into the other and county into city and actually
|
|
15
|
even across state boundaries.
|
|
16
|
So, if such an amendment has been introduced,
|
|
17
|
I think the analysis or the assignment of this particular
|
|
18
|
phase of our research should wall include determining
|
|
19
|
what if anything has been done and is being done in the
|
|
20
|
Legislature along the line of governmental change and
|
|
21
|
administrative setup.
|