|
 
|
27
|
|
1
|
determination.
|
|
2
|
MR. MELVIN: Mr. Chairman, that is what I had
|
|
3
|
in mind when I suggested that this analysis of local
|
|
4
|
government include a study of the present constitutional
|
|
5
|
provision on home rule, and I agree that it probably would
|
|
6
|
have to be done by those who are lawyers because it is an
|
|
7
|
area in which there is considerable doubt among the many
|
|
8
|
people I have talked to as to just exactly where the line
|
|
9
|
is drawn under the present provisions.
|
|
10
|
THE CHAIRMAN: I think that is true. In this
|
|
11
|
whole field of local subdivisions and, more or less,
|
|
12
|
governmental setup, there is so much overlapping and inter
|
|
13
|
fold that you sometimes get lost in just exactly whether
|
|
14
|
you are dealing with one form of home rule or another form
|
|
15
|
of home rule, or just what really is included in the very
|
|
16
|
idea of home rule and, as time goes on, I think you begin
|
|
17
|
to find that it covers a tremendous breadth of govern-
|
|
18
|
mental forms under that one caption; and to have some
|
|
19
|
definition or appreciation of the fact that it docs cover
|
|
20
|
a wide range, where it may be metropolitanism, it may be
|
|
21
|
federalism, it may be regionalism, it may be something
|