276                                            LAWS OF MARYLAND                                [Ch. 2

Art. 51, §9 (d) — limitations on duty,
appears as §8-209 since it deals with both
grand and petit juries, and is a separate
provision dealing with persons exempt from
service, rather than excuses.

Art. 51, §9 (e) is placed in §8-208(c), since
it deals with summoning of talesmen, not
excuses or exclusions.

Art. 51, §9 (f) is placed in §8-401, the
penalties section.

The only other changes made are in style.

SEC. 8-211. CHALLENGING COMPLIANCE WITH SELECTION
PROCEDURES.

(A)   MOTION IN CRIMINAL CASES.

IN A CRIMINAL CASE, BEFORE THE VOIR DIRE
EXAMINATION BEGINS, THE DEFENDANT OR STATE'S ATTORNEY,
AS THE CASE MAY BE, MAY MOVE TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT
OR STAY THE PROCEEDINGS ON THE GROUND OF SUBSTANTIAL
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS TITLE IN
SELECTING THE GRAND OR PETIT JURY.

(B)   MOTION IN CIVIL CASES.

IN A CIVIL CASE, BEFORE THE VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION
BEGINS, ANY PARTY MAY MOVE TO STAY THE PROCEEDINGS ON
THE GROUND OF SUBSTANTIAL FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS TITLE IN SELECTING THE PETIT JURY.

(C)    EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION; STAY OF
PROCEEDINGS ON FINDING OF SUBSTANTIAL FAILURE TO
COMPLY.

AFTER A MOTION IS FILED UNDER SUBSECTION {A) OR
(B) OF THIS SECTION, CONTAINING A SWORN STATEMENT OF
FACTS WHICH, IF TRUE, WOULD CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS TITLE,
THE MOVING PARTY IS ENTITLED TO PRESENT THE TESTIMONY
OF THE JURY COMMISSIONER OR CLERK, ANY RELEVANT
RECORDS AND PAPERS NOT PUBLIC OR OTHERWISE AVAILABLE
USED BY THE JURY COMMISSIONER OR CLERK, AND ANY OTHER
RELEVANT EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION.

(D) REMEDIES FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SELECTION
PROCEDURES.